Showing posts with label Samsung. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Samsung. Show all posts

Friday, April 26, 2013

International

facebook: ipo debacle

The sizzle and fizzle of the most hyped IPO

Apple’s co-founder Steve Wozniak had reportedly warned Mark Zuckerberg about the glitches he might face on taking Facebook public. But when the hottest and most awaited IPO finally made it to Nasdaq on Friday, May 18, the mood was ebullient. Facebook’s public debut seemed like the greatest coming-out party in Wall Street’s history. Nobody thought that the euphoria would come crashing down barely hours later. For all the frenzy and ecstasy that went into the making of the Facebook IPO, the stock’s performance on the bourse has been quite anticlimactic. In a portentous sign of all that could go wrong and take the whoop out of investors’ joy, the IPO’s execution of trade was delayed by nearly 30 minutes on the first day itself. And things have gone from bad to worse thereafter. The share price tanked by nearly 13.1% by day five of trading. Even earlier, by day three itself, it had become clear that the breathlessly hyped $16-billion IPO would face difficulty in living up to its giddy expectations. The fall in the stock’s value and the accompanying embarrassment turned decidedly disconcerting after news emerged that Morgan Stanley, the lead underwriter of the Facebook IPO, had played some hokey-pokey by not fully disclosing the company’s revenue forecast in the run-up to the IPO. As a result of these avoidable shenanigans, not only is the stock still trading well below its initial offering price of $38 over a week after listing, the company is also now having to contend with shareholder lawsuits and government investigations. The IPO, which was universally touted as the poster child of the business of social media, could well become the new whipping boy for more Wall Street reform. However, not all investors have lost hope. Many believe that the IPO can still take Facebook’s valuation to nearly $104 billion and churn out money in the long run. But the ranks of believers are fast diminishing.

Nokia: Troubled business

Can Nokia pull itself up again?

It has been more than two years now since Finnish handset maker Nokia began losing steam to players like Apple and Samsung. The company has lost nearly 23.8% in global handset market share. Nokia’s handset shipments stood at 82.7 million units in the 1st quarter of 2012 (down from 108.5 million units in Q1, 2011). Analysts fear that considering the rate at which Nokia is burning its cash reserves, it may not be able to ward off the risk of debt default. Just five years ago, Nokia had piled up a whopping $12.54 billion in cash reserves, but over the past five quarters, it has used up $2.7 billion to prop up its faltering business. And there could be another outgo of $2.51 billion in the next quarter. The company’s short-term bonds for 2014 have already been rated as junk by Standard & Poor’s and Fitch.


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2013.
An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles
 

Thursday, July 26, 2012

Stratagem-TELECOM: MANUFACTURING

Depite a Humongous Growth in The Telecom Sector, The Country has failed to build an Ecosystem that Promotes Telecom Manufacturing, Forcing Operators to Import most of The Equipment for their networks.

Telecom equipment manufacturing in India took off just after Independence. In 1948, the first Public Sector Unit (PSU) – ITI– was formed. In the initial stages it met 50% of the domestic demand for telecom equipment. However, in 1993-94, the government withdrew the defrayment of its R&D expenditure. ITI, which had six manufacturing facilities then, was hit hard by the government decision. That was the time when telecom sector had started opening up and demand for telecom equipment had begun to grow considerably. ITI was not able to match the rising demand.

Today, handset is the only telelcom device, which is manufactured in India. Top MNCs, including Nokia, Samsung and LG have manufacturing facilities in the country. Some domestic players, including Mircomax, Karbonn and Lava have plans to start manufacturing in India. But for them manufacturing only make sense when they can sell 1 million units per month or have at least 10% of the total market share, which seems a difficult target for them to meet in the next few years.

On the other hand, telecom service providers in India are not happy with the recommendations of the regulator. Service providers are against putting a cap on the telecom equipment purchase from foreign vendors. They fear that it will kill competition in the market and inflate equipment prices. Telecom service providers’ industry body Cellular Operator Association of India (COAI) has expressed concern over TRAI’s recommendations. “It is good that the government is promoting equipment manufacturing in India. But there should be no binding obligation on telecom operators to buy from them. If the standard of equipment manufactured by local players matches the global standards and prices there is no question of not buying from them” says R.S. Mathews, Director COAI.

Apart from the dearth of local telecom equipment manufacturers, there are other reasons that have held down manufacturing. The law of the land itself supports imports over home manufacturing. Manufacturing needs the support of various electronic components but ironically duty is levied on the import of components as against there being no duty on import of finished products. Testing of wireless equipment is another problem. Spectrum is needed to test a wireless equipment of which there is again scarce availability. “Testing of equipment is one of the biggest challenge that we are facing. We need to test equipment for months before commercial launch. However, Indian authorities allocate testing spectrum for a maximum for 30-day-period, which is not enough. Besides, the entire process of getting spectrum is painful and lengthy,” says a senior official of a telecom equipment manufacturing firm, pleading anonymity. His company test its equipment in a foreign location.

Numerous challenges lie ahead before telecom equipment manufacturing can be pushed from its present abysmal level. The biggest is getting the Department of Telecom’s approval on TRAI’s recommendations in its present form. Also, other than rolling out incentives and tax waivers, the government has to make the entire process of setting up manufacturing units hassle-free. At present one has to take several NOCs to set up an unit, unlike in the East-Asian countries where it is a single window operation and takes a maximum of one week to fifteen days. If the existing roadblocks are not removed then making India a manufacturing hub will forever remain a distant dream.